Category — Vaginal Laxity

(C) Lauri Romanzi, 2010

Pelvic organ prolapse, the medical term for vaginal bulges caused by damage to the connective tissues supporting the organs above and around the vagina (the uterus, bladder, rectum and vaginal opening), is a silent epidemic affecting women worldwide. Common terms include dropped bladder, dropped uterus, rectocele and vaginal laxity. Recent estimates using US Census population projections anticipate a 46 percent increase in pelvic organ prolapse among American women over the next 40 years, from 3.3 million in 2010 to 4.9 million. According to a recent study from Duke University, it is possible that the number of women with prolapse will be even greater than this, up to 9.2 million. Prolapse may occur to varying degrees in up to 50 percent of women who’ve given birth. Prolapse can even cause depression.

Childbirth contributes to most prolapse conditions, however genetics, medical disorders such as connective tissue disease, diabetes and obesity, and lifestyle habits have all been shown to contribute to pelvic organ prolapse risk. I’ve had many young women in their 30’s with prolapse who’ve never been pregnant, or found themselves suffering a dropped bladder after an easy and quick delivery of their first normal (or even low) weight baby. Even cesarean section is no guarantee against pelvic organ prolapse, with 5% of women in one recent study suffering severe, palpable and visible prolapse even though they delivered by cesarean section before going into labor. The role of Kegel fitness and Kegel exercise in the prevention of treatment of pelvic organ prolapse is just recently getting the research attention it deserves, and Kegel exercise may well play a role in prevention and treatment of prolapse. But for certain, if you suffer prolapse that looks like the image below, no amount of pelvic floor Kegel exercise, or any other kind of exercise, will pull your parts back into place.

Prolapse surgery often comes with a recommendation for hysterectomy, but the latest trends highlight new techniques that fix the prolapse just as well without removing the uterus. When the uterus prolapses it can be resuspended by one of several techniques, and the surgery holds up just as well as when a hysterectomy is included in prolapse repair surgery. This uterine resuspension concept is an exciting new option that allows many women to undergo prolapse repair surgery without removing any organs.

While many women with prolapse believe just one single body part is out of postion, most commonly, prolapse involves hernia-type displacement of several organs. When the bladder drops, formally called a cystocele (siss-toe-seal), it is often accompanied by a rectal bulge, called a rectocele (wreck-toe-seal).  Laxity at the vaginal opening, called a perineocele (pear-in-ee-oh-seal) results when the perineum loses connective tissue bulk as a result of childbirth.  Uterine prolapse is called, well, uterine prolapse. But behind a prolapsed uterus, it is common to find an internal small intestine hernia called an enterocele (en-tare-oh-seal).

When you put all these prolapse possibilities together at their absolute worst, it looks like this:

Courtesy WomensVoicesForChange.org

My role as guest blogger gives me the opportunity to demystify this deeply troubling malady.  For more information, check out this first of 2 posts on pelvic organ prolapse done for my friends at Sweet Talk on The Spot:

Dr R covers Prolapse, Part 1 for Sweet Talk on The Spot

To review Dr R’s book on prolapse, see www.plumbingandrenovations.com

If you have any questions, send in your comments on this post or post your own question to Ask Dr R.

(C) Lauri Romanzi, 2010

(c) Lauri Romanzi 2010

Vaginal rejuvention, a mystical term with many facets, new darling of cosmetic surgery and battle cry of the “anti-medicalization of female sexuality” crusade, is a marketing term with no formal medical definition, this despite the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007 Clinical Practices Bulletin on the topic that was rife with both admonishments against some, and guarded approval of other, procedures advertised under this “VR” label. Some 3 years after the ACOG bulletin, concern and confusion reign on as the definition of vaginal rejuvenation continues to mutate.  

As a reconstructive pelvic surgeon and urogynecologist, I’ve been dealing with “Vaginal Rejuvenation” requests of all types since the term went public. As far as I can tell, the public’s interpretation of vaginal rejuvenation falls into three groups, listed here in order of increasing controversy and decreasing volume of safety & efficacy data:

Procedures to correct prolapse and incontinence

Procedures to alter the appearance of vulvar structures

Procedures alleged to enhance female sexual gratification

For a perspective-setting preview, consider reading this 2009 review of vaginal rejuvenation by Dr. R, and an excellent piece on birth plans written by Sharon Bond, PhD, Certified Nurse Midwife, here:

NAFC Quarterly Update Vaginal Rejuvenation & Childbirth Planning

These 2 articles, written for the National Association for Continence quarterly newsletter, dovetail nicely. As it turns out, much of what patients consider “vaginal rejuvenation” has a lot to do with childbirth-related changes in pelvic floor anatomy and function. As a contributor and member of NAFC (National Association For Continence, www.nafc.org), I share this fantastic online resource for information on pelvic floor disorders.  While the NAFC focus is on bladder and bowel control (as evidenced in the name), they do a great job of bringing up-to-date information on sex and well being to the public.

THE INSIDE SCOOP ON VAGINAL REJUVENATION

UPDATE 2010

Vaginal rejuvenation is a tenaciously fashionable concept, still with no strict medical definition. Yes that’s right, things vaginal continue to be fashionable. And, as with fashion, much is left to creative interpretation.

For many women, the childbearing, peri- and post- menopausal years come with pelvic, sexual, urinary, rectal or vaginal problems. Vaginal laxity, pelvic prolapse, poor bladder control, vaginal dryness, sexual pain, or waning sexual response can truly affect how you feel about yourself and your ability to enjoy your life. In medicine, we use “quality of life” questionnaires to measure the affect of such symptoms on health‐ mental health, ability to work, play, travel, enjoy sex, and feel normal and intact as a woman. If things aren’t right, you have options. These options, under the newly minted term “vaginal rejuvenation”, continue to spark controversy, raising concerns about safety, efficacy, and medical ethics.

With those options come obligations. Your obligation includes examining your motivations, taking stock of the overall impact of the condition(s) on your quality of life, and obtaining several medical or surgical opinions before you start any therapy or sign up for any surgery.  The doctor’s obligations include sorting out whether your condition(s) warrant physical, medical or surgical therapies or some combination thereof, and to help you understand what the risks, benefits and alternatives are for your personal mix of issues and symptoms.

Vaginal rejuvenation skipped onto the medical stage a few years ago, with no formal medical definition, in response to increased demand for  cosmetic alteration of gynecologic structures, most commonly the labia minora (inner vaginal lips). It has since come to mean any variety of procedures and treatments, many with an established record of use for generations, and others with no established history, little to no safety or efficacy data, and no predictable result.

“Vaginal Rejuvenation” for pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal laxity, and incontinence

Women with vaginal laxity, prolapse or  incontinence  might not know what “prolapse” or “incontinence” truly mean, but all women instinctively understand the notion of vaginal rejuvenation.

For a new mother, vaginal rejuvenation may mean improving pelvic muscle tone, and vaginal snugness with Kegel muscle exercises in a formal postpartum rehabilitation program of biofeedback (think “vaginal video games”) and pelvic floor electrical stimulation. For a 43 year old tennis‐playing mother of 3, it could mean minimally invasive surgery for “exert and squirt” type urinary incontinence (stress incontinence), with “perineoplasty” to restore the perineum (connective tissue between vagina and anus) back to normal, “rejuvenating” bladder control and vaginal snugness to pre‐baby condition. Or uterine resuspension, bladder lift, rectum reinforcement (rectocele repair), perineoplasty and a minimally invasive sling for combined prolapse and stress incontinence – what I call “the blue plate special.”

Vaginal Rejuvenation Traditional Medical Terminology

Vaginal muscle fitness = Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation a.k.a. Kegel Exercise

Lift a dropped bladder = Anterior Colporrhaphy*

Tighten a vagina permanently widened by childbirth= Perineoplasty

**Fix a bulging rectum = Posterior Colporrhaphy

Repair a leaky bladder = Urethral Sling or Urethral Bulking Injections

Restore anal control = Anal Sphincteroplasty

Lift a dropped uterus = Uterine Resuspension, aka Hysteropexy

***”Vaginoplasty” = creation of a vagina (often using  loop of intestine) in a woman born with congenital absence of the vagina, or creation of a vagina in a woman whose vagina is scarred shut from disease (fistula, radiation effect, infection, radical pelvic cancer surgery). More recently, under the marketing concept of vaginal rejuvenation, it has come to mean any combination of procedures from any of the basic three categories (prolapse/incontinence, cosmetic, sexual enhancement) for women without congenital or acquired obliteration defects of the vagina.

*Also referred to as “anterior repair”

** Also referred to as “posterior repair”

***On “vaginoplasty”, in the realm of “vaginal rejuvention” for women born with normal vaginal anatomy, this procedure, commonly attached to the word laser, as in “Laser Vaginoplasty” or “Laser Vaginal Rejuvenation”, carries no description in any medical or surgical textbook or peer review journal.  As of June, 2010, neither “laser vaginoplasty” nor “laser vaginal rejuvenation” are now or ever have been taught in any surgical or gynecological residency training program, nor in any urogynecology, female urology, plastic surgery, or other reconstructive surgical subspecialty fellowship training program. If you want to know about laser vaginoplasty, patient choice is restricted to consultation with a doctor who paid to be trained by the founder of the laser vaginal rejuvenation procedure. These doctors pay a fee to spend several days learning the procedure(s). The fee includes the franchise purchase, after which purchasing physician participates in an exclusive, robust webmarketing network restricted to purchasers of the franchise, the only doctors who may perform the laser vaginal rejuvenation procedures. These franchise-purchasing physicians are under contractual obligation that forbids discussing or otherwise disclosing the actual technique to anyone who has not purchased the franchise, including colleagues or the press. As such, and despite patient satisfaction testimonials on the franchise physician websites, there is no scientific, peer reviewed data in any peer reviewed medical journal documenting the actual technique, efficacy or safety of laser-based vaginal rejuvenation procedures

For some women, “rejuvenate” = “relubricate” (see When rejuvenate = relubricate). Vaginal dryness, poor lubrication and reduced clitoral sensitivity, common symptoms after menopause, are easily remedied with low‐dose vaginal estrogen therapy, treating the target areas without giving your body a full dose of estrogen.

With “vaginal rejuvenation” in the public lexicon, many women with prolapse or menopause-related vaginal dryness or problematic urinary incontinence eagerly seek out a little rejuvenating, often the same women who reject the unsexy but medically accurate labels of “pelvic organ prolapse” , “vaginal atrophy” or “incontinence.” For women over 50, the risk of severe pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence are about 5%, and this increases in women who are overweight, or who have birthed children, particularly large babies and long pushing stage of labor.  A recent study of over 3000 women ages 50‐61 showed 6% with symptomatic, high‐grade prolapse.  Some estimates show 50% of women who’ve born children will have variable degrees of pelvic organ prolapse, from asymptomatic to gravely symptomatic.  By 2050, the number of women with urinary incontinence is expected to increase by 46%, and those with pelvic organ prolapse by 55%, with the number of American women with at least one pelvic floor disorder increasing from 28.1 million in 2010 to 43.8 million in 2050.

Whether you call it prolapse repair, incontinence therapy, or vaginal rejuvenation, pelvic floor disorders condition and related treatments (with “laser vaginal rejuvenation” the exception) come with generations of experience documented in medical and surgical texts and reams of data in myriad peer-reviewed medical journals.

“Vaginal Rejuvenation” to alter the appearance of the vulva and vaginal opening

Reduce and remodel inner labia = labiaplasty

Restore the hymen to a virginal state = hymenoplasty or “revirgination”

Reduce wrinking of outer labia = labial filler injections (of fat, collagen or other filler)

Labiaplasty reduces and remodels large inner labia (labial hypertrophy), or restores symmetry to unbalanced labia (labial asymmetry). Women requesting labiaplasty reduction and recontouring of the inner labia minora is often  report physical discomfort from labial catching, chafing, rubbing and folding in clothing or with sexual or other vigorous activities like tennis, yoga, running and biking. Women’s current propensity to depilitate all vulvar hair and wear thongs, the ad infinitum wearing of jeans formerly reserved for the under-30 set, intertwine with inevitable yet subtle changes in inner-outer labial consistency and relative size and natural age related vulvar wrinkling, resulting in unprecedented complaints of physical discomfort from this artificially increased labial exposure. I find many such patients adamantly unwilling to restore Mother Nature’s natural labial cushion that comes from full-growth pubic hair, full crotch underwear, and pants that aren’t painted on. I tell every labiaplasty patient every time, and 9 times out of 10, this (self-selected and therefore biased) group opts for the labiaplasty operation over nature’s blueprint.

The role of enculturation cannot be underestimated. On the other end of the labial alteration spectrum, from a region of the world more famous for rite-of-passage female genital mutilation than female sexual gratification, comes the regionally popular central African practice of labial elongation, believed to enhance female orgasm, female ejaculation, and sexual satisfaction for both male and female sides of the coital equation: Rwandan women enhance gratification with \”labial elongation\”

Hymen restoration involves careful reconnection of the hymen remnants to recreate a pseudo-virginal state, most commonly requested by women from cultures requiring virginity at the altar, but gaining popularity here in the States from women seeking “revirgination”. This procedure meets with much scrutiny, given the inherent cross-cultural and socio-ethical issues involved.

Labial bulking of the outer labia reduces age-related wrinkling as the body’s youthful fat pads diminish not only in the vulva, but also in the cheeks, hips, extremities and around the joints. These fat pads are well understood by cosmetic surgeons, who commonly plump up  facial cheeks made hollow by age-related loss of facial fat, often using liposuctioned fat from the patient’s own buttocks, abdomen or thighs. Popularized by these same cosmetic surgeons, women with age-related fat pad volume loss in the labia majora reportedly undergo similar bulking filler injections into the labia majora in cosmetic surgery offices.

As with rhinoplasties, lip enhancements, cheek and buttock implants, liposuction and all other cosmetic procedures, these “not medically necessary” labial alteration procedures are not covered by insurance. The physician is obligated to evaluate patient motivations, and to do their professional best to avoid performing them on women addicted to cosmetic procedures or suffering from body dysmorphia, both contraindications to cosmetic procedures.

A woman seeking labiaplasty for severe congenital asymmetry or labia that routinely catch, tear or chafe with sporting or sexual activities are not the same as patients responding to cruel comments from an unworthy sexual partner or insecure because they “don’t look like the women in porn movies”. Labiaplasty procedures are included in surgical texts, with techniques and data published in peer reviewed medical and surgical journals. Much controversy surrounds labial and hymenal procedures, taken as yet another sign of the increased medicalization of female sexuality, with “female sexuality as a newly minted profit center for unethical surgeons and greedy pharmaceutical corporations” as the banner-head under which such protests march. (see Professor Leonore Tiefer)

The controversy rages on, hitting fever pitch with the next category of rejuvenation procedures:

“Vaginal Rejuvenation” to enhance sexual gratification

Clitoral unhooding

G-Spot amplification (a.k.a. the G-shot)

Sub-clitoral bulking injections

This category of VR procedures carry significant risks, with sparse to no efficacy data published in peer reviewed medical or surgical journals.

Clitoral unhooding reduces or removes the skin folds over the clitoris. As an anatomy instructor at Weill Cornell Medical College, I consider clitoral unhooding an inherently risky procedure, given its proximity to the clitoral nerves and the small and vulnerable clitoris.

G‐spot amplification, another “sexual enhancement” procedure involves an injection of collagen or other bulking agent (same fillers used for facial wrinkles) into the front vaginal wall. The theory behind such an injection is to create a temporary (as collagen always absorbs and disappears) bump beneath the Grafenberg’s spot to enhance sexual response.

Sub-clitoral injections underneath the clitoris using filler bulking agents such as collagen or hyaluronic acid are purported to “lift” the clitoris, increasing exposure of the sensitive clitoral glans, allegedly to enhance sexual sensitivity.  This poorly documented procedure continues to flirt around the Upper East Side of Manhattan, offered primarily in cosmetic surgical offices.

Each of these sexual enhancement procedures carries the risk of scarring, pain, infection and numbness. Benefits are unclear, as the miniscule amount of peer-review data currently available used non-validated patient questionnaires administered by the surgeons themselves as opposed to blinded reviewers, and did not include objective measures of nerve function and other measures of genital function and sensitivity.

What say the gynecologists?

In 2007, The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology issued a warning about all of these vaginal rejuvenation cosmetic and sexual enhancement procedures in Bulletin #378,  finding labiaplasty and perineoplasty “may be warranted in properly selected patients,” while reserving endorsement of G‐spot enhancement, the ill‐defined “vaginoplasty,” the mystery-shrouded, copiously marketed laser vaginal procedures, and clitoral unhooding, until each procedure garners the necessary peer review safety, efficacy, and technique disclosure warranted by medico-ethical standards of clinical acceptability.

For synopsis ACOG bulletin: ACOG committee opinion #378 on cosmetic gynecology

What say the plastic surgeons?

Nothing, really.

from American Society of Plastic Surgeons: ASPS weighs in on vaginal rejuvenation, sort of

There are a number of different vaginal rejuvenation procedures that can be performed by board-certified plastic surgeons. Here, an ASPS Members Surgeon explains the reasons why women may seek out procedures such as this. Learn more about cosmetic procedures.

Note: Some of the procedures and technologies presented in the following videos may be under investigation and presented for research and educational purposes. More scientific study may be needed to determine efficacy and success rate. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation (PSEF) do not endorse the procedures or technologies presented nor do the statements of the individual physicians represent the opinions, positions, or recommendations of the ASPS or PSEF.

From The American College of Surgeons, The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons and the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgeons: Zero.

Except for ASPS saying “we can do it”, these non-gynecologic surgical societies, whose vaginal rejuvenating members aggressively online advertise cosmetic gynecologic procedures, provide no medico-ethical professional statements for us to consider, despite the widespread adoption of things gynecologic into the plastic surgeon’s arena. This “plastic/cosmetic surgeon as vaginal rejuvenator” phenomenon spawned a competitive explosion in the marketing of “vaginal rejuvenation”, replete with page after page of graphic, genital BEFORE AND AFTER images, something gynecologic surgeons had never previously adopted into office, online or related marketing practice. Given the robust vaginal and vulvar enthusiasm demonstrated by many plastic and cosmetic surgeons, you’d expect their professional societies to weigh in on the ongoing vaginal rejuvenation debate with something more than “we can fix your vagina and we have the images to prove it”  regarding this controversial corner of medicine.

If you’re interested in cosmetic “vaginal rejuvenation”, begin a conversation with yourself about your motivations and perspective: Cosmetic Gynecology Personal Perspective Litmus Test

While doctors, medical societies and health advocates rage on in the debate about what is and what is not acceptable vaginal rejuvenation, each patient is fairly clear about her individual rejuvenation goals. Vaginal rejuvenation is whatever you need it to be‐ Kegel exercise to improve vaginal muscle tone, bladder control and orgasm; vaginal estrogen for lubrication and clitoral sensitivity; prolapse operations to resuspend the dropped uterus, bladder and rectum; perineoplasty to restore vaginal snugness after childbirth; minimally invasive incontinence procedures or medications for bladders not controlled by Kegel exercise alone, each available as needed to get your pelvic life back on track. The cosmetic procedures to alter the labia or hymen, and to a greater extent, the operations promising sexual ehancement, carry relatively escalated levels of scrutiny due to concerns about the medicalization of female sexuality, and the variable dearth of data regarding both safety and efficacy.

REFERENCES OF INTEREST

Medicalization of Sexuality:

Professor Leonore Tiefer Home Page

Forecasting pelvic floor disorders:

Pelvic floor disorders 2010 – 2050

Labiaplasty technique:

Labiaplasty overview and link to technique monograph

Labiaplasty technique

Clitoral unhooding and mixed genital plastic surgery:

Female cosmetic genital surgery

Multicenter study of female genital plastic surgery

Hymen restoration:

Should doctors do virginal reconstruction for adolescent girls? Cultural considerations cannot be ignored,

Reconstructing the hymen: mutilation or restoration?

Hymen reconstruction:ethical and legal issues

Perineoplasty:

Vaginal laxity and post-perineoplasty images

Perineoplasty in women with sensation of a wide vagina

Combined anal sphincteroplasty and perineal reconstruction for fecal incontinence in women.

Kegel muscles and sex:

female orgasm: role of pubococcygeus muscle

vaginal contractions in female orgasm

The Science of Sex circa 1982

Orgasm mechanics the same in women and men

Dr. Romanzi, 19 years ago I gave birth to my daughter, and while she was being delivered I was torn from my vaginal opening to my anus. The Dr. didn’t repair the torn skin correctly, and I am very self conscious about this. I also have a very hard time wipeing my BM all the way. Is their anything that can be done for this?

Thank K

Dear K,
Even with correct technique at the time of delivery these deep tears often don’t heal perfectly due to the swelling and hormonal changes in skin and deep connective tissues during pregnancy and delivery that result in less than optimal healing from childbirth tears. That said, it is very likely that your anatomy and function can be restored or significantly improved with reconstructive surgical repair of the perineum (perineoplasty) and/or anal sphincter (anal sphincteroplasty). Sometimes perineoplasty alone is enough. Whether one or both procedures might be advised can only be determined through clinical examination, after which various other imaging and colorectal tests might be advised to determine the optimal procedure(s) for your personal situation. It’s been 19 years! Pull this up to the top of your priority list and get the information you need. Thanks for sharing your story. Please keep us posted!

Dr R

Dear Dr. Romanzi,
I recently finished your book and found it quite informative. I had my first baby when I was 35, pitocin-induced with no pain medication. After a short but extremely intense labor, my labia tore off and although the doctor tried to repair it, it doesn’t feel (or look) quite right and seems to flap open all the time. I also feel like my vagina is a wind tunnel, especially when I do yoga–it makes a lot of noises. Ever since the birth I have suffered from stress incontinence but I’m not sure if I have prolapse. Several doctors have told me I am too young for a sling or surgery and simply recommended kegel exercises. I’ve tried kegels and even got the Myself (a biofeedback system) and nothing has improved my incontinence. I am now 38 and 20 weeks pregnant (not planning any other pregnancies). How soon I can get these issues fixed after I deliver? Do you think I am too young for a sling?

Dear Reader,
No one is “too young for a sling”, provided they suffer significant stress urinary incontinence. Two categories of incontinence apply to most women with bladder control problems, those being stress (”exert and squirt” leaking with cough, sneeze, lift, running, etc) and urge (overactive bladder, urination before seated on toilet), and about 1/3 of women with incontinence have a little of both problems.
Kegels are a good therapy for both types of incontinence in about 70% of cases, including mixed stress/urge. Once you’ve birthed the baby, you may be well served to spend 12 weeks working properly wtih a pelvic floor physical therapist rather than on your own with or without a Kegel exercise gadget. It’s like working with a personal trainer, typically yielding better results. If this fails, you may need medications or electric stimulation for urge incontinence, and a sling for stress incontinence. Slings do not reliably improve urge incontinence, an important distinction should a sling be recommended for you – it is likely that overactive bladder symptoms will persist after a sling, with the “exert and squirt” symptoms gone, or significantly reduced.
The vaginal laxity may also respond to Kegel exercise because the exercises can bulk up the vaginal muscles, making for snugger inner contour. If this does not work, reconstructive surgery may be done with or without concomitant sling, and your labum can be repaired at the same time. The exact best procedure for you, however, can only be determined with a proper pelvic support examination and bladder function testing.
Typically, women are advised to complete childbearing before undergoing reconstructive surgery for laxity, prolapse and stress incontinence, since pregnancy after said operation(s) may undo the results.
Thank you for sharing you story!
Best Regards, Dr R